Zeroing in on Zero-harm
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer for improving mine worker safety, but an expanding
array of possible solutions makes it easier to tailor a program for success
By Russell A. Carter, Contributing Editor
One of the principal challenges in this environment is to identify the factors that actually affect worker-safety compliance and performance. A 2020 survey by the U.S. government’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) looked at this issue by ranking the relative importance of various safety “constructs” — the term for a research concept and tool that measures a characteristic or trait — in determining the most significant worker influences on health and safety (H&S) as defined by worker proactivity, compliance, and reported near-misses or other incidents. The constructs included four of a personal nature (risk tolerance, thoroughness, sense of control and adaptability) and six that were organizational (organizational support, supervisor support, supervisor communication, coworker communication, worker engagement and training).
The study, which involved more than 2,600 workers at 39 mine sites throughout 17 states, produced some interesting results. According to the authors, while all 10 constructs were meaningful predictors of compliance, workers’ risk tolerance was a predominant factor, followed by workers’ thoroughness and coworker communication. H&S training and organizational support were statistically significant but less important as influencing factors. These results, according to the authors, indicated, first, the prime status that personal constructs possess in predicting workers’ H&S performance; and second, the value organizations could gain from accounting for and addressing both organizational and personal factors where possible.
Through identifying and describing the potential impact that both personal and organizational indicators have on H&S compliance and performance, the authors suggested their report could provide general guidance that organizations may use to begin addressing selected H&S practices and, over time, scale their systems to include additional indicators. In addition, they mentioned certain areas of focus that could be used to develop or enhance various workplace safety initiatives that encourage personal responsibility. Some of these, in no particular order of importance, include: • Recognizing that risk tolerance among workers is a trait that can be changed over time. Consequently, employers should work toward improving workers’ decision-making capabilities. • Taking a second look at current training practices and how much they focus on improving workers’ opportunities and involvement regarding their roles in work processes and practices. • Enhancing worker engagement opportunities. The report provided examples that have been successful, such as allowing workers to choose a new type of personal protective equipment (PPE) based on a variety of approved options; involving workers on various health and safety committees, including participation in walk-throughs and debriefs on-site; and improving communication quantity and quality throughout the workday.
Powering Up for Data Delivery
There’s no shortage of recommendations
— online, in research literature, or from
consultancy sources — for addressing
mine safety issues. As might be expected
from recent industry trends, many of
these suggestions are geared toward increased
data collection and analysis. A
critical factor in maintaining continuity in
data flow is power grid reliability. The industry’s
needs for digital solutions in this
area haven’t escaped the notice of multinational,
multisegmented companies
like Hitachi, which purchased an 80.1%
share of ABB’s Power Grids business in
2020. The acquisition, now known as
Hitachi ABB Power Grids, provides an
avenue for Hitachi to combine the power
grids business with its digital technologies
for expanded market opportunities.
E&MJ spoke with Bryan Friehauf, senior vice president of enterprise software solutions, at Hitachi ABB Power Grids, and Jason Hartley, senior vice president of customer success, to get a better idea of how the company’s capabilities can be leveraged beyond power-grid operations to improve mine safety. Friehauf pointed out that Hitachi ABB Power Grids has access to many years of expertise and experience through ABB’s installation base of both electrical distribution equipment and plant control systems. “Combine that with our software solutions and we have the capability to provide IT and OT tools to operators through a single plane of glass, so to speak — a convergence that provides a higher degree of situational awareness of asset status.”
“That convergence allows us to place critical asset information not just in the hands of control room staff, but also into the hands of on-site workers through mobile devices,” Hartley added. “If something has to occur before a worker can safely enter a location, like de-energizing a machine or closing a valve, they can be sure it’s been done by checking their handheld and not just relying on the control room. The safety factor also extends to knowing beforehand if a machine or system is showing signs of malfunction, say, overheating or overpressure. The worker can be warned to not approach until the risk has been reduced or eliminated.”
Higher worker efficiency also can play into a safety scenario: “Through better information transfer, worker training and qualifications can be checked before they’re assigned to a task, so you don’t just have an operator trying to handle a job that requires specialized training or experience,” Friehauf said. “And, quick access to parts inventory data means that once they’re at the site, they don’t need to search around for parts location or installation instructions, they can get that information on a handheld or wear a video headset to display and receive whatever information is needed.”
Advanced visualization capabilities made possible through enhanced network performance and other digital solutions also can contribute to improving safety in an industry workforce that’s changing — older employees are retiring, taking with them the knowledge and skills acquired through years on the job; while more contractors are appearing on site, working in locations or on equipment that they may not be totally familiar with. Moving beyond the concept of digital- twin models that is increasingly being used to improve mine-system design and performance, Friehauf envisages “operational” virtual twin models that show not just a digital rendering of assets, but also include as much physical, sensory information about an asset as possible.
“This would provide the ability to use the virtual model as a training tool — overlaying the real with the digital and incorporating step-by-step guided assistance to make sure the worker is following procedure” — either in a realistic simulation session or an actual repair assignment, he explained. “This type of technology is what will be needed to extend the skills and experience of older workers to new hires entering the workforce.”
Safe Design: First in Line?
Big safety problems can represent tantalizing
opportunities for Big Data solutions.
But, before companies contemplate
using data as their primary tool for
safety improvement, a more basic first
step is often recommended: eliminating
hazards in equipment, structures or processes
during the design process. Safe design involves integrating hazard identification and risk assessment methods
early in the design process, to eliminate
or minimize risks of injury throughout
the life of a product.
In the field or in the plant, fixed-base machinery with external movable parts, such as conveyors, often are the focus of safety efforts because of their high rate of involvement in safety incidents. As the article from Martin Engineering explained, safety and reliability — and a corresponding decrease in risk exposure for maintenance crews — can be incorporated into new or existing conveyor systems by utilizing Hierarchy of Control methods for alleviating hazards, with safe design considerations vital for minimizing safety risks.
The Hierarchy of Controls concept (elimination, substitution, separation, engineering, administrative, personal protective equipment) is now accepted throughout the industry, with leading producers such as BHP making it a foundational element in their safety risk management efforts involving everything from design and construction of new facilities to changes in existing operations and the design, planning, scheduling and execution of work. BHP also actively encourages innovation from its suppliers to bolster the company’s safety capabilities. For example, maintainers at BHP Mitsubishi Alliance’s (BMA) Caval Ridge mine wash plant will no longer be exposed to rotating machinery during filter press repairs because of a solution developed through BHP’s Supplier Innovation Program.
In January, Australian-owned Jord International was awarded a contract to work with the maintenance team at Caval Ridge to pilot their solution. Jord’s solution comprises a belt cartridge installer within a self-contained steel frame that holds a new belt and removes the old, damaged belt. The first belt installer will go into service by July, and run for six months. If successful, the new approach will be implemented permanently at Caval Ridge, and potentially at other BMA sites. James Agar, group procurement offi- cer, said the Supplier Innovation Program enables BHP to crowd-source a broader range of unique and innovative solutions to business challenges. “With filter press belt replacements, it is a time-consuming task with lots of manual handling. While there are processes in place to control the risks around that task, the new solution proposed through this innovation program eliminates the need for maintainers to be in physical contact with the filter press altogether,’’ James said.
Make Management Part of
the Solution
Scott Gaddis, vice president and global
practice leader for environment, safety
and health at environmental health and
safety quality software developer Intelex,
wrote in a blog post for the American
Society of Safety Professionals that even
companies with the best safety-culture
intentions sometimes fail to achieve satisfactory
results because of a misdirected
point of view. Focusing exclusively
on compliance and mistaking compliance
for culture are common mistakes;
another is assuming that safety culture
originates in the front lines of the job
force, rather than recognizing that management
is instrumental in fostering culture as well. (See Formula for Effective
Safety Management: Observe, Plan, Do,
Check, for a safety management consultant’s
view of the industry.)
Severstal, the vertically integrated steel producer, which operates four large mines in Russia, is just one of many companies expanding the role and responsibilities of managers in safety initiatives. It announced in April it will start disclosing data on industrial injury rates (LTIFR) for contractors working at the company’s production sites, and contractor safety targets will also be included within the personal KPIs of top management from 2021. The company said the annual remuneration of a number of senior employees, including the CEO, is directly linked to occupational safety performance.
Companies interested in supervisory improvement may benefit from Mine Standards Training, a product recently introduced by equipment simulator developer Immersive Technologies. MST is designed to impart a deeper understanding of potential accident-causing scenarios for front-line supervisors, according to the company, which said that focus on improving the supervision and coaching of heavy equipment operators via improvement of supervisor proficiency led to its development. “Gone are the days where it takes a full year for a supervisor to be exposed to all types of weather, traffic, loading and digging conditions. This exposure and skills development can now be accomplished by immersing the learner into a replicated 3D mining environment through VR and touchscreen technology,” said Cian Dobson, visual database manager at Immersive.
The company described MTS as “dynamic, offering users the option to operate in Virtual Reality via our existing Worksite VR Quest platform, or on an interactive classroom touchscreen. These two options leverage current simulation assets to create engaging content such as drilling and blasting, ground engagement tools, supervisor training, pit priority rules, and many more related situations.” “Imagine being able to simulate a scenario from surface or underground operations, put it on a virtual table and walk around it. Now add the capability to view the process from the cabin of any machine, or teleport to the pit floor itself. Then, take this scene and insert visual cues a supervisor should be able to identify, assess and correct. Sometimes these cues are subtle and sometimes obvious. Some are visible immediately; some are only clear at various times of the day or from a certain vantage point.”
Dobson said the system would help supervisors “create realistic simulations in Mine Standards Training of both perfect and flawed operator behavior requiring the user to identify the deviations from best practices. This capability is helping transform existing flat content training programs to ones that are engaging and have higher levels of learner engagement and knowledge retention. The content is highly realistic and will improve the learning experience for both experienced and inexperienced users.”
Technology Can Help
The variety, capability and availability of
technological solutions that can be applied
to identify and possibly solve worker-
safety issues continues to grow. Product
and application concepts that once were
regarded as beyond state of the art are now
showing up in the workplace as everyday
tools for work and information sharing.
Vuzix Corp. recently announced that Rio Tinto has deployed its Smart Glasses at the Oyu Tolgoi mine in Mongolia, enabling technical experts at other locations to remotely work with local teams on the mine site. And last year, Beumer Group, a material-handling systems supplier, announced the availability of its own Smart Glasses, designed to allow office-based company technicians to “look over the shoulder” of workers onsite to assess equipment problems. As explained by Christopher Kirsch, team leader for the project, said, “The employee at the machine puts on the glasses and starts the Beumer support app via voice command. The employee transmits a service number and a pin code to the hotline, and the connection with image and sound is established. The Beumer technician receives the same image as the customer. The technician can directly give instructions and display all relevant information in the field of vision. The employee has both hands free to follow the instructions of the expert and carry out the necessary actions.”
Diversified minerals producer Teck said it has completed a pilot project that used an innovative combination of onthe- ground data and video technology developed by Nanozen Industries to help understand potentially harmful dust exposures at a task level in order to closely focus critical control strategies. Nanozen is a Vancouver, Canada-based company that pursues innovative approaches to aerosol exposure analysis for industrial workplace environments. The project included Teck’s Greenhills, Fording River, and Highland Valley Copper operations.
Teck explained that it’s been standard industry procedure for years to rely on daily sampling methods, averaged over the length of a shift, to determine dust exposure, but these sampling methods provide only one value indicating an employee’s overall dust exposure for a shift. By making use of Nanozen’s real-time monitoring technology, Teck said it was able to greatly improve the collection of information about dust levels during a work shift. Instead of a single value for an entire shift, the company can now monitor live, accurate information on dust exposures, enabling it to better understand how and when these exposures occur and to target controls that reduce exposures from higher-risk activities. Other potentially safety-related solutions coming through the technology pipeline were once considered sciencefiction fantasies but are now promising prototypes undergoing field testing. For instance, Piaggio Fast Forward (PFF), a subsidiary of the Piaggio Group, and positioning-system specialist Trimble reported recently on a proof-of-concept collaboration to enable mobile robots and machines to follow humans and other machines in industrial applications. Together, the companies have integrated a “smart following” module prototype developed by Piaggio Fast Forward on to a Boston Dynamics’ Spot robot platform controlled by Trimble’s advanced positioning technology.
The technology, called PFFtag, could be accessed by business partners to leverage its exclusive algorithms and their own software, enabling a human to control a robot via pairing and improving its ability to sense direction and velocity as it follows the leader. A push of a button activates a fused sensor array that pairs to a leader who navigates Spot or another robot or machine in dynamic environments, without special training, joystick, app or tablet. Ultimately, said the project partners, this can create a wider range of applications for existing machines and positively impact productivity, safety and quality of work.
Trimble conducted testing using a Spot robot equipped with Trimble laser scanning or Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) sensors and PFFtag technology at one of its customer’s sites in Colorado over the course of two months. Aviad Almagor, division vice president, Trimble Emerging Technologies, said the technology may have the future ability to assist field personnel in their daily activities by carrying heavy equipment, improving efficiency and enhancing worker safety.
Integration is Key
While safe design is an excellent first
step for eliminating safety incidents
before they can occur, a recent article
published by Deloitte highlights the advantages
of using predictive data analysis
to go one step farther by enabling
companies to surpass simple analysis of
past events and identify potential future
scenarios that create a higher risk of an
incident occurring.
The key to success in this effort is
integration, as the authors explained:
“One of the sticking points for advanced
analytics... involves aggregating the right
data. Many companies have learned the
hard way that simply collecting massive
amounts of safety data is insufficient.
Most mining companies have in-depth reports
tracking the number of worker injuries
sustained, the frequency rate of safety
incidents, and many other metrics. But
this data is all collected after the fact.”
Companies serious about monitoring conditions to proactively prevent incidents need greater insight into the circumstances and drivers of those incidents. However, many companies struggle to access this level of data. That’s partly because it often resides in disconnected systems. “As mining companies move toward integrated nerve centers and begin to build enterprise-wide data lakes, they’ll be able to harness the data necessary to run advanced predictive models,” explained Shak Parran, partner, consulting, Deloitte Canada and co-author of the February 2021 report, On the Road to Zero Harm: Creating the next generation of integrated predictive safety systems, along with Gerhard Prinsloo.
By allowing companies to combine vast amounts of data, rather than viewing each in isolation, an integrated approach can help them uncover hidden patterns of behavior or conditions that contribute to incidents. At the same time, predictive models can position them to target high-risk operational scenarios and employee groups in order to intervene before these incidents occur. The authors asserted that real insight into solving safety problems hinges on mature data governance, with mining companies perhaps appointing chief data officers or other executives responsible for establishing data standards across the organization. Turning the potential for a zero-harm future into reality may also require mining companies to look beyond their own internal data sources.
“To successfully predict the risk level of activities, many disparate data sources are required — sometimes even from several companies,” Parran noted. “This underscores the need for greater cross-industry collaboration.”