US EPA Issues Final Anaylsis of its Gold King Spill
The report provides the agency’s interpretation of pre-existing river conditions, the movement of metals related to the Gold King release through the river system, and the effects of the release on water quality. The research supported the EPA’s earlier statements that water quality returned to the levels that existed prior to the release. “While data indicate that water quality has returned to pre-event conditions, the EPA is committed to continue our work with states and tribes in the river system affected by the Gold King mine release to ensure the protection of public health and the environment,” said Dr. Thomas A. Burke, science advisor and deputy assistant administrator of the EPA’s Office of Research and Development.
In an effort to minimize the damage the agency inflicted on the environment, the report compares the total amount of metals entering the Animas River following the release with the average amount of metals generated by acid mine drainage from the Gold King mine and carried by the river in one to two days of high spring runoff. The report did note that the concentrations of some metals in the yellow plume that polluted the waterway all the way to Lake Powell were “higher than historical mine drainage.” The report said metal concentrations within the plume decreased as they were diluted by river water and as some of the metals settled to the river bed, justifying EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy’s statements during the event regarding the waterway’s self-healing abilities.
The agency said there were no reported fish kills in the affected rivers, and post-release surveys by multiple organizations have found that other aquatic life does not appear to have suffered harmful shortterm effects. The concentrations of metals in well-water samples collected after the plume passed did not exceed federal drinking water standards. No public water system using Lake Powell as a source of drinking water has reported an exceedance of metals standards since the release.
In related news, on January 13 an independent claims officer within the EPA, which was guided by the U.S. Department of Justice, made a decision that the administrative claims brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) in connection with the disaster would not be paid. After careful analysis, the claims officer concluded that the agency was not legally able to pay compensation for the claims, the EPA said.
According to the EPA, “The act does not authorize federal agencies to pay claims resulting from government actions that are discretionary — that is, acts of a governmental nature or function and that involve the exercise of judgment. Because the agency was conducting a site investigation at the Gold King mine under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the agency’s work is considered a ‘discretionary function’ under this law. Therefore, the circumstances surrounding the Gold King Mine incident unfortunately do not meet the conditions necessary to pay claims.”
Those who have filed claims or whose claims have been denied have six months to challenge the decision with the United States District Court.