Coping with Success: PDAC Presenters Suggest
Methods for Managing Boom-Cycle Issues
Almost 18,000 people converged on Toronto, Canada, in early March
to attend the 75th International Convention, Trade Show and Investors Exchange
sponsored by the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada. With the
current mining boom showing no signs of weakening, the prevailing attitude of
attendees and speakers was upbeat—but as with any thriving enterprise, success
can spawn problems that would be of little concern during mining’s periodic
down cycles.
For example, at the convention’s keynote session Frontier Strategy
Group Managing Director Alex Gorbansky discussed how to achieve, and maintain,
success in the face of increased nationalistic tendencies. According to Gorbansky,
today’s market environment has strong parallels to that of the 1970s, including
high commodity prices, uncertainty about new sources of supply, global economic
growth and mineral demand fueled by a new economic powerhouse—China (Japan
was the major catalyst in the 70s), and a global resurgence in the desire of countries
to gain greater control and economic benefits from their natural resources—an
approach commonly described as “resource nationalism.”
Gorbansky emphasized
that responding to resource nationalism is critical for industry growth and highlighted
the upside opportunities created by the trend. “While traditionally seen
as a downside risk, the cyclical nature of resource nationalism can provide companies
and investors with unique upside opportunities for growth,” he explained.
“Resource nationalism is not cause for despair, but rather, provides companies
and investors that respond strategically and proactively with access to new reserves
and opportunities to acquire assets not available to their competitors.
“The
character and nature of resource nationalism varies significantly and successful
firms will develop context-specific responses.” He described a framework
highlighting four types of resource nationalism: State Domination, Balanced State
Participation, Geopolitical Expediency, and Greater Economic Participation (see
accompanying table).
He outlined three strategies that companies can employ to
respond to resource nationalism: “New and creative partnerships that align
economic and political incentives between foreign investors and host governments
over the long-run, branding the company as a local national player versus a foreign
entity, and social development programs that have clear and measurable impacts
at the local and national levels.”
As an example of “incentive alignment,”
Gorbansky pointed to Rio Tinto’s effort to gain a foothold in Russia. To
accomplish this, Rio Tinto and Russian metals producer Norilsk created a joint
venture exploration company called RioNor; Norilsk owns a 51% stake and Rio Tinto
owns the minority share. The company is focused on exploration in the highly prospective
regions of southern Siberia and the Far East Federal district.
The arrangement
served to align the interests of both companies; i.e., no upfront financial commitment
was made by either party and most issues concerning ownership of discovered assets
were deferred. From Rio Tinto’s perspective, the JV represented a low-cost
way for the company to gain its desired foothold; while for Norilsk and the Russian
government, the JV provided capital and technical expertise to examine under-explored
regions with high economic potential. Rio Tinto, explained Gorbansky, was willing
to trade legal certainty for a limited up-front financial commitment because it
realized that paper agreements were unlikely to be respected anyway.
As another
example, BHP Billiton has successfully branded its South African operations as
local, rather than foreign, said Gorbansky. “Foreign mining firms operating
in South Africa have faced a number of challenges as black empowerment requirements
and increased resource nationalism has threatened to erode already shrinking profits.”
BHP Billiton is well-positioned to survive these challenges, he noted, by initiating
efforts aimed at “localizing” its operations. The BHPB Development
Trust funds scholarships, health programs and other highprofile projects that
make the benefits of the company’s presence clear to a broad cross-section
of the population. BHPB also has appointed South African executives to head its
local subsidiaries giving these companies a local face. And, the company has created
relationships with local companies to align their interests with BHPB’s;
for example, BHPB’s energy- coal operations are the largest supplier of
coal to South African utility Eskom.
Moving outside the mining sector, Gorbansky
named Exxon Mobil as an example of a company that has effectively dealt with resource
nationalism: “Exxon has successfully made Africa— where its operations
account for more than 1 million barrels of crude oil production per day—a
foundation of its growth, while avoiding the high-profile mishaps that have plagued
Shell and others through strategic social development programs and communications
strategies that clearly demonstrate Exxon’s positive economic and social
contributions to the places where it operates.” Exxon, which has discovered
more than 25% of its petroleum resources in Africa over the past eight years,
also has been the most successful at fending off strong competition from Chinese
firms in Angola, Nigeria and Chad, Gorbansky said.
Anvil Mining’s Dikulushi copper mine in the Congo will go underground later this year.
The $7-million project will initially
use sublevel caving to produce 20,000 mt/y Cu and
1.8 million oz/y Ag. Photo: Anvil Mining Ltd.
Sharing the Wealth
Increased risk of adverse political events
fueled by a nation’s perception of exploitation without adequate compensation
can be a major issue during periods of strong metals markets, and in no place
is this concern more evident than in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This central
African nation is struggling to regain stability after years of political upheaval
and civil war, and has made significant strides in that direction by implementing
a new mining code in 2003 and installing a democratic government. During the PDAC
conference a panel discussion involving four mining companies active in this area
highlighted the level of local involvement needed to build the trust and cooperation
necessary for successful long-term operations in the southern DRC/northern Zambia
region.
The four companies—Anvil Mining Ltd., Equinox Minerals Ltd., Katanga
Mining Ltd. and Tenke Mining Corp.—are at different stages of development
in projects scattered along the Central African Copper Belt, a highly mineralized
zone 400 km long and 50 km wide straddling the border of Zambia and DRC, estimated
to contain more than 200 million mt of copper metal.
Perth, Australia-based Anvil
Mining was an early entrant in this region, having commissioned the Dikulushi
openpit mine in October 2002. According to Bill Turner, president and CEO, Dikulushi
contains a high-grade resource base of 169,000 mt of contained Cu and the deposit
is open at depth. Average grade is 7.2% Cu with 6.7 oz/t Ag, while concentrate
grade is approximately 59% Cu and 1,700 g/t Ag. The surface mine was designed
to produce 20,000 mt/y of Cu and 1.6 million oz/y Ag, at a total capital cost
of about $17 million. Underground production at Dikulushi is slated to begin in
the third quarter of 2007, with an estimated minimum production life of six years.
Anvil also has three other copper belt projects: Its Kulu mine, in operation since
late 2005, is a joint venture with Gécamines to recover copper from 4.9
million mt of coarse rejects and tailings grading about 4.4% Cu. Under a lease
agreement with Gécamines, it has developed the Kinsevere copper/cobalt
project 27 km north of Lubumbashi, containing an estimated total resource of 1.6
million mt of Cu, and plans to commission the mine during the second quarter of
2007. It also is conducting an extensive exploration program under way on lands
surrounding the closed Mutoshi copper mine.
According to Turner, Anvil is “strongly
committed” to pursuing community engagement and improvement goals. Its 1,800-person
African workforce is 95% Congolese. The company has engaged Washington, D.C.-based
Pact and other international NGOs to design and implement a range of community
development activities, and under the mining convention Anvil signed with the
DRC government in 1998, earmarks 10% of its earnings— amounting to roughly
$3 million in 2006, slightly more expected in 2007— for community development
in the Dikulushi region. To date, Anvil has invested in a new school and teaching
staff at Dikulushi, an upgraded medical center at Kilwa, new water service at
Dikulushi and several other social initiatives.
London-based Katanga Mining is
rehabilitating a mine complex near Kolwezi in the DRC, comprising the Kamoto underground
mine and the openpit mines of Dikuluwe, Mashamba East and Mashamba West (together
known as DIMA) and Musonoie-T17. Ore will be processed in the Kamoto concentrator
and refined in the Luilu metallurgical plant. The mine site covers an area of
more than 15,000 hectares.
Katanga Mining President and CEO Arthur Ditto said
total reserves and resources at the company’s DRC properties now stand at
200 million mt ore. At an average copper grade of 3.29%, this equates to 6.58
million mt of Cu. Because exploration has not been carried since the early 1980s,
there is significant potential for new discoveries.
The company plans a phased,
$427- million rehabilitation project stretching over a period of four years. Once
fully operational, production will be 150,000 mt/y of copper and 5,000 mt/y of
cobalt. Total operational cost per pound of copper over the life of the project
is predicted to be $0.22. Production from the $80.3-million underground mine project
was scheduled to start in April 2007, with first copper produced in December.
The Kamoto concentrator is being refurbished at a cost of $55.2 million to handle
7.5 million mt/y ore, which will be sufficient capacity for all production phases,
and is scheduled for commissioning in July 2007. Concentrates from the mill will
be delivered via pipeline to a similarly renovated metallurgical plant at Luilu
that features separate copper and cobalt leach circuits, roasting facilities and
electrowinning tankhouses, and a new tailings facility. This plant, when commissioned
at an estimated capex cost of $150.1 million in September 2007, will be capable
of producing 175,000 mt/y copper and 8,000 mt/y cobalt.
At Katanga Mining’s Kamoto project, the route for the
concentrate delivery pipeline has
been cleared and work is under
way to install pipes in anticipation of a September startup.
Photo: Kantanga
Mining Ltd.
Ditto explained that the
company anticipates contributing more than $2.18 billion in taxes, royalties,
wages and other spending to the Congolese economy over its 20-year lease. The
initial redevelopment of the mine is expected to create around 1,600 jobs. During
the operational phase, up to 2,500 people will be directly employed, with double
that number indirectly employed in the supply chain. There will also be a significant
multiplier effect as increased consumer spending supports local businesses. Ditto
said the company has worked to provide a steady potable water supply for the village
of Luilu, and together with other mining companies in the area, has refurbished
130 km of roads in the area.
Tenke Mining is partnered with U.S. copper producer
Phelps Dodge in development of the Tenke Fungurume project located in DRC (E&MJ,
January/February 2007, p. 4), one of the world’s largest, highest grade
undeveloped copper-cobalt deposits.
During mine operations, a special social development
fund has been committed by the project whereby 0.3% of net sales revenue will
provide annual funding to local and regional social development projects. This
fund and its projects will be managed by a board of trustees with involvement
by the operator, community leaders, local government authorities and specialist
program advisors. Current social development programs are aimed at improving living
conditions for the communities within the Tenke Fungurume mineral concessions.
These programs are also being managed by Pact, which in turn supervises specialist
NGO’s administering the projects.